Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy vs. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for jaundice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Retrospective, multicenter study (GALLBLADEUS Study).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) vs. EUS-gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for jaundice resulting from malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to MDBO who underwent EUS-GBD or EUS-CDS with lumen-apposing metal stents after failed ERCP. The primary end-point was clinical success rate. Secondary end-points were technical success, periprocedural adverse events rate (<24 h), late adverse events rate (>24 h), overall survival, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included: 41 underwent EUS-GBD and 37 underwent EUS-CDS. MDBO was mainly the result of pancreatic cancer (n = 63/78, 80.7%). Clinical success rate was similar for both procedures: 87.8% for EUS-GBD and 89.2% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.8). Technical success rate was 100% for EUS-GBD and 94.6% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.132). Periprocedural morbidity (<24 h) rates were similar between both groups: 4/41 (9.8%) for EUS-GBD and 5/37 (13.5%) for EUS-CDS (P = 0.368). There was a significantly higher rate of late morbidity (>24 h) among patients in the EUS-CDS group (8/37 [21.6%]) than in the EUS-GBD group (3/41 [7.3%]) (P = 0.042). The median follow-up duration was 4.7 months. Overall survival and time to recurrent biliary obstruction did not significantly differ between the groups. DISCUSSION: After failed ERCP for MDBO, EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS show comparable clinical success rates and technical success. EUS-GBD appears to be a promising alternative for MDBO, even as a second-line treatment after failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and compare the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS.

Gastric volumetry for the assessment of fundic compliance and visceral hypersensitivity in patients with gastroparesis: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The evaluation of visceral hypersensitivity and gastric accommodation in patients with gastroparesis (GP) is difficult. CT-scan gastric volumetry allows to test the distension of different regions of the stomach. We aimed to study gastric volumes and patient's sensitivity to gastric distension between in patients with GP compared to patients with GERD. METHOD: Retrospective study including patients who had CT-scan volumetry for GP or GERD. Two CT-scan series were made after gastric distension: left lateral decubitus 30° (LLD30) for antrum and right lateral decubitus (RLD) for body. Pain and discomfort were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). Gastric volumes were measured for LLD30 and RLD. RESULTS: 13 patients (7 GP and 6 GERD) were included. Mean age was 35.6+/-7.3 years. Median gastric volume in the RLD was lower in GP vs GERD (927+/-208 ml vs. 1115+/-163 ml; p = 0.046) while it was similar for LLD30 (1053+/-228 ml vs. 1054+/-193 ml; p = 0.603). GP patients had significantly more pain and discomfort during the procedure: pain VAS for GP was 6[0-9] versus 0[0-2] for GERD, p = 0.004, discomfort VAS for GP was 7[4-10] versus 4[0-5] for GERD, p = 0.007. 66.7% of GERD patients felt no pain vs. 14.3% in GP, p = 0.053. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that GP could be associated with a reduced gastric volume compared to GERD in RLD after gaseous distension. In contrast, patient self-assessment of pain related to gastric distension was greater int GP patients. A lack of fundus accommodation and visceral hypersensitivity could explain some mechanisms in the genesis of GP symptoms.

Gastroparesis is associated with lower volumes in right lateral decubitus suggesting a lower distensibility of the fundus.Gastric volumetry is more painful in patients with gastroparesis than GERD controls, suggesting visceral hypersensitivity to mechanical distension.

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy versus botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: results of a double-blind randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising technique for treating refractory gastroparesis. We present the first double-blind randomized study comparing the clinical efficacy of G-POEM versus pyloric botulinum toxin injection (BTI). METHODS: This randomized study, conducted in two expert centers, enrolled patients with refractory gastroparesis, medically managed for >6 months and confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), into two groups, G-POEM versus BTI, with follow-up of 1 year. The primary end point was the 3-month clinical efficacy, defined as a >1-point decrease in the mean Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score. Secondary end points were: 1-year efficacy, GES evolution, adverse events, and quality of life. RESULTS: 40 patients (22 women; mean age 48.1 [SD 17.4]), with mean symptom duration of 5.8 (SD 5.7) years, were randomized. Etiologies included idiopathic (n=18), diabetes (n=11), postoperative (n=6), and mixed (n=4). G-POEM showed a higher 3-month clinical success than BTI (65% vs. 40%, respectively; P=0.10), along with non-significantly higher 1-year clinical success (60% vs. 40%, respectively) on intention-to-treat analysis. The GCSI decreased in both groups at 3 months and 1 year. Only three minor adverse events occurred in the G-POEM group. The GES improvement rate was 72% in the G-POEM group versus 50% in the BTI group (non-significant). CONCLUSION: G-POEM seems to have a higher clinically relevant success rate than BTI, but this was not statistically demonstrated. This study confirms the interest in treatments targeting the pylorus, either mechanically or chemically, for managing refractory gastroparesis.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy and valve section for treatment of persistent and disabling dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) to treat refractory GERD may induce refractory dysphagia (5%-10%). The management is complex, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) including valve incision is a new therapeutic option. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients with postfundoplication refractory dysphagia treated by POEM associated with complete wrap incision. Patients were evaluated with Eckardt and dysphagia scores. Study objectives were to evaluate clinical and technical outcomes, adverse events, and GERD recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients, with a mean age of 57.3 ± 15.6 years, were included. Mean follow-up was 25.3 ± 17.6 months. The technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 84.6%, respectively. Among failures, 1 patient underwent Lewis-Santy, 2 required dilations, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Three late recurrences occurred and were endoscopically managed. Five patients (19%) had GERD recurrence that was mainly improved by proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: POEM with fundoplication is a serious therapeutic option for managing persistent dysphagia after LF, with a low risk of GERD recurrence.

Training in esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on an ex vivo porcine model: learning curve study and training strategy.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a very effective treatment for achalasia. However, training remains non-standardized. We evaluated a training curriculum, including ex vivo cases, followed by patients' cases under expert supervision. The objective was to establish a learning curve of POEM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four operators having completed advanced endoscopy fellowship were involved. They had already observed > 30 cases performed by experts. They performed 30 POEMs standardized (tunnel and myotomy lengths) procedures on ex vivo porcine model. Procedural times, number/volume of injections, mucosal and serous perforations, and myotomy length were collected. The learning curve was assessed using dissection speed (DS) and a dedicated performance score (PS), including learning rate (LR) and learning plateau (LP). RESULTS: The operators completed all cases within 4 months (median of 3.5 cases/week). The mean procedural time was 43.3 min ± 14.4. Mean myotomy length was 70.0 mm ± 15.6 mm. Dissection speed averaged 1.78 mm/min ± 0.78. Using DS and PS as parameter, the LR was reached after 12.2 cases (DS = 2.0 mm/min) and 10.4 cases, respectively. When comparing the LP and the plateau phase, the DS was slower (1.3 ± 0.5 mm/min versus 2.1 ± 0.54 mm/min, p < 0.005) and perforations were decreased: 0.35 ± 0.82 in LP vs. 0.16 ± 0.44 in PP. Following this training, all operators performed 10 supervised cases and are competent in POEM. CONCLUSION: The association of observed cases and supervised ex vivo model training is effective for starting POEM on patients. The learning curve is 12 cases to reach a plateau.

Evaluation of the safety profile of endoscopic pyloromyotomy by G-POEM: a French multicenter study.

Background: Gastric per oral endoscopic esophageal myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising procedure to treat refractory gastroparesis. The safety profile of G-POEM is an important topic because gastroparesis is a functional pathology, with a procedure whose effectiveness is between 50 and 65% depending on the studies. Objectives: We present this retrospective multicenter study, with the aim of establishing a safety profile, focusing on serious adverse events (AEs). Design: This was a multicenter observational cohort study conducted in five French expert centers. Methods: All patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis between 2015 and 2021 were included for analysis. AEs were classified into per endoscopic, early postoperative, and late postoperative, up to 1 month. Their severity was assessed using Dindo-Clavien and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy classification. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of G-POEM severe AEs. Secondary objectives were to document other postoperative AEs, and to identify predictive factors. Results: In all, 217 patients were included: 81 men and 136 women, mean age 52 ± 17 years. The average procedural time was 44 ± 14 min (12-78). The average hospital stay was 3.7 ± 2.3 days. The AEs rate classified as Clavien-Dindo ⩾3 was 0.4% (one delayed bleeding requiring blood transfusion and endoscopic management). There were no deaths or patients admitted to intensive care unit. The rates of mucosotomy and capnoperitoneum were 3.7 and 1.8%, respectively, without clinical consequences. Most patients (81.5%) did not experience any AE. Three cases of dumping syndrome occurred, quickly managed by dietary measures. Conclusion: Our study confirms the safety of G-POEM with less than 0.5% of serious AEs, medically managed. This outcome makes this a procedure to have a good benefit-risk ratio.

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy in refractory gastroparesis: long-term outcomes and predictive score to improve patient selection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data exist concerning the long-term efficiency of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) as a treatment of refractory gastroparesis. This study evaluated the 3-year results of G-POEM in patients with refractory gastroparesis. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of all G-POEM operations performed in 2 expert French centers for 46 patients with refractory gastroparesis with at least 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical success was 65.2% at 36 months. There was significant improvement in symptom severity. Median Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index decreased from 3.33 to 1.80 (P < .0001), with improvement in all subscales. We created a predictive score concerning G-POEM success (G-POEM predictive score) to which points were assigned as follows: nausea subscale <2: predictive of success, 1 point; satiety subscale >4: predictive of success, 1 point; bloating subscale >3.5: predictive of success, 1 point; percentage of gastric retention at 4 hours on scintigraphy >50%: 1 point. A threshold of 2 was identified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an area under the curve of .825 that predicted clinical success with a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], .77-.99), specificity of 56.3% (95% CI, .33-.77), positive predictive value of 80% (95% CI, .67-.93), negative predictive value of 81.8% (95% CI, .59-1.00), and accuracy of 80.4% (95% CI, .69-.92). Patients with a score ≥2 were significantly more likely to be responders at 3 years than were patients with a score <2 (80% and 18%, respectively; P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical success of G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis was 65.2% at 36 months. Our predictive score offers an easy tool that needs to be confirmed in other studies.

Mycophenolate mofetil decreases humoral responses to three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: After 2 doses, the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination seems to be lower in solid organ transplant recipients than in the immunocompetent population. The objective of this study was to determine the humoral response rate after vaccination, including with a booster dose, and to identify risk factors for non-responsiveness in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: We included all patients seen in consultation in two French liver transplant centres between January 1, 2021, and March 15, 2021. RESULTS: 598 liver transplant recipients were enrolled and 327 were included for analysis. Sixteen patients received one dose, 63 patients two doses and 248 patients three doses. Anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies were detected in 242 out of 327 (74.0%) liver transplant patients after vaccination. Considering an optimal serologic response defined as an antibody titre >260 BAU/ml, 172 patients (52.6%) were responders. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment was an independent risk factor for a failure to develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination (OR 0.458; 95%CI 0.258-0.813; p = .008). Conversely, male gender (OR 2.247, 95%CI 1.194-4.227; p = .012) and receiving an mRNA vaccine (vs a non-mRNA vaccine) (OR 4.107, 95%CI 1.145-14.731; p = .030) were independent predictive factors for developing an optimal humoral response after vaccination. None of the patients who received the vaccine experienced any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Even after a third booster dose, response rate to vaccination is decreased in liver transplant recipients. MMF appears to be a major determinant of seroconversion and optimal response to vaccination in these patients.

Dysphagia in Children, Do Not Blame Eosinophils Too Quickly.

Dysphagia in children is a relatively frequent symptom in childhood, and the main causes are congenital and linked to ear-nose-throat etiologies. However, non-congenital esophageal dysphagia is less common, and the main cause in such cases is eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). When there is no response to a well-conducted treatment, with normalization of histology, the diagnosis of EoE must then be reconsidered. Here, we present the case of a 10-year-old patient whose initial diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis delayed the diagnosis of type III achalasia.

Assessment of long-term results of repeated dilations and impact of a scheduled program of dilations for refractory esophageal strictures: a retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with benign and refractory esophageal strictures (BES), repeating initial dilations in short intervals could be recommended, but little data are available to validate this strategy. Our aim was to evaluate long-term results of a scheduled program of repeated and sustained esophageal dilations in patients with refractory strictures. METHODS: Patients with BES requiring five or more dilations were retrospectively included and divided in two groups for analysis: a SCHEDULED group (SDG) where patients were systematically rescheduled for the 5 first dilations; ON-DEMAND group (ODG) where patients were dilated only in case of recurrence of the dysphagia. Comparison between SDG and ODG was done with a 1:1 matching analysis and etiology of stricture. Clinical success was defined as the absence of dysphagia for more than a year. RESULTS: 39 patients with refractory BES were included with post-operative stenosis in 51.2% and post-caustic injury 28.2%; 10 were in SDG and 29 in ODG. In overall analysis (39 patients), the follow-up was 64.4 ± 32 months, success rate was 79.5% and duration of treatment was 27.3 ± 20 months, and mean number of dilations was 11.7 per patient. The need for dilations decreased significantly after 18 months of treatment with an average of 0.56 dilations per semester. Self-expandable metallic stent insertion was associated with an increased rate of complications (5.9% vs 59.1% p = 0.001). In matched analysis (10 ODG vs 10 SDG patients), the duration of treatment was lower in SDG (18.8 vs 41.4 months, p = 0,032) with a higher probability of remission (survival analysis, Log-rank: p = 0,019) and the success rate did not differ between ODG and SDG patients (80% vs 90%; NS). CONCLUSION: Overall, long-term esophageal dilations resulted in a 79.5% success rate and the need for further dilatations decreased significantly in both groups after 18-month follow-up. A scheduled dilation program was associated with a higher probability of final success and lower treatment duration.

Detection of soluble biomarkers of pancreatic cancer in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration samples.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers are urgently needed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the cornerstone for diagnosing PDAC. We developed a method for discovery of PDAC biomarkers using the discarded EUS-FNA liquid. METHODS: This retrospective study included 58 patients with suspected pancreatic lesions who underwent EUS-FNA. Protein extracts from EUS-FNA liquid were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomic and clinical data were modeled by supervised statistical learning to identify protein markers and clinical variables that distinguish PDAC. RESULTS: Statistical modeling revealed a protein signature for PDAC screening that achieved high sensitivity and specificity (0.92, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98, and 0.85, 95 %CI 0.67-0.93, respectively). We also developed a protein signature score (PSS) to guide PDAC diagnosis. In combination with patient age, the PSS achieved 100 % certainty in correctly identifying PDAC patients > 54 years. In addition, 3 /4 inconclusive EUS-FNA biopsies were correctly identified using PSS. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA-derived fluid is a rich source of PDAC proteins with biomarker potential. The PSS requires further validation and verification of the feasibility of measuring these proteins in patient sera.

Endoscopic management of concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant obstruction: Impact of the timing of drainage for one vs. two procedures and the modalities of biliary drainage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant obstruction are a severe condition mainly managed by duodenal and biliary stenting, which can be performed simultaneously (SAMETIME) or in two distinct procedures (TWO-TIMES). We conducted a single-center retrospective study to evaluate the feasibility of a SAMETIME procedure and the impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-hepaticogastrostomy in double malignant obstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2018, patients with concomitant malignant bilioduodenal obstruction treated endoscopically were included. The primary endpoint was hospitalization duration. The secondary endpoints were bilioduodenal reintervention rates, adverse event rates, and overall survival. Patients were divided into groups for statistical analysis: (i) divided according to the timing of biliary drainage: SAMETIME vs. TWO-TIMES group, (ii) divided based on the biliary drainage method: EUS-HG group underwent hepaticogastrostomy, while DUODENAL ACCESS group underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PCTD) or EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy (EUS-CD). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included (19 women, median age = 71 years). Stenosis was mainly related to pancreatic cancer (17 patients, 54.8%). Sixteen patients were in the SAMETIME group, and 15 were in the TWO-TIMES group. Biliary drainage was performed by EUS-HG in 11 (35.%) patients, PCTD in 11 (35.%), ERCP in 8 (25.8%) and choledoduodenostomy in 1. Thirty patients died during follow-up. The median survival was 77 days (9% confidence interval [37-140]). The mean hospitalization duration was lower in the SAMETIME group: 7.5 vs. 12.6 days, P = 0.04. SAMETIME group patients tended to have a lower complication than TWO-TIMES (26.7% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.10). The EUS-HG group tended to have a lower complication rate (5% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.07) and less biliary endoscopic revision (30% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.37) than DUODENAL ACCESS. CONCLUSIONS: SAMETIME drainage is associated with a lower hospital stay without increased morbidity. EUS-HG could provide better access because it did not exhibit a higher complication rate and showed a tendency toward better patency and fewer complications.

Identification of factors associated with aggressive end-of-life antitumour treatment: retrospective study of 1282 patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Antitumour treatment in the last 2 weeks of death (ATT-W2) and a new regimen of ATT within 30 days of death (NATT-M1) are considered as aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care. We aimed to assess factors associated with inappropriate use of antitumour treatment (ATT) at EOL. METHODS: Data of patients with cancer who died in 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2019 in a single for-profit cancer centre were retrospectively analysed. ATT was divided into chemotherapy (CT), oral targeted therapy (OTT), hormonotherapy and immunotherapy (IMT). RESULTS: A total of 1282 patients were included. NATT-M1 was given to 197 (15.37%) patients, and 167 (13.03%) had an ATT-W2. Patients with a performance status of <2 and treated with CT had more both ATT- W2 (OR=2.45, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.65, and OR=10.29, 95% CI 4.70 to 22.6, respectively) and NATT-M1 (OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.90, and OR=8.41, 95% CI 4.46 to 15.86). Predictive factors of a higher rate of ATT-W2 were treatment with OTT (OR=19.08, 95% CI 7.12 to 51.07), follow-up by a medical oncologist (OR=1.49, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.17), miscellaneous cancer (OR=3.50, 95% CI 1.13 to 10.85) and length of hospital stay before death of <13 days (OR=1.92, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.79). Urinary tract and male genital cancers received less ATT-W2 (OR=0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.89, and OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.99) and patients treated by IMT or with age <69 years more NATT-M1 (OR=19.21, 95% CI 7.55 to 48.8, and OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.37). Patients followed up by the palliative care team (PCT) had fewer ATT-W2 and NATT-M1 (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.71, and OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Most recent ATT and access to a PCT follow-up are the two most important potentially modifiable factors associated with aggressive EOL in patients with cancer. Early integrated palliative oncology care could help to decrease futile ATT at EOL.

Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become the most commonly used bariatric surgery worldwide. However, there are a proportion of patients who present with a refractory GERD after this procedure. In these patients, when surgical conversion to RYGPB is not possible or declined, we propose to describe the results of an endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy band (ARM-b) technique in 6 LSG patients with refractory GERD. The technical feasibility was 100%; 5 out of 6 patients had a clinical response with a reduction of the GERD-HRQL score of > 50%. Two patients had adverse events: one esophageal stricture and one benign bleeding. ARM-b is feasible and potentially effective to treat patients with refractory GERD after LSG.